Scope sensitivity is the clearest cross-scope finding.
Williams %R showed different research results across the complete 32-scope set: a measurable association was present in 22 scopes, while 10 had no measurable association. 4 scopes showed at least one supported regime. The evidence therefore does not support one universal trading relationship.
22 of 32scopes with measurable association
10 of 32scopes with no measurable association
4 of 32scopes with any supported regime
PARAMETER ROBUSTNESS
How the indicator outputs respond when tested parameters move
Unavailable
No valid public indicator-level parameter-robustness summary is available for this profile. Malformed or contradictory evidence is not rendered, and the authoritative overall verdict remains unchanged.
WHAT WAS MEASURED
A complete canonical research sweep
32/32measured scopes
8instruments
4timeframes
22 of 32scopes with measurable association
10 of 32scopes without measurable association
ASSOCIATION PROFILE
Observed association across measured scopes
Descriptive research
Association varies across measured scopes: 22 of 32 showed a measurable association, while 10 of 32 showed none.
Strong 0Useful 13Weak 9None 10
The distribution describes the supplied information bands across measured scopes; it is not one universal rating for the indicator.
Scopes with a measurable association22 of 32 scopes
Observed association range-0.061 to -0.020
Average observed association-0.0379
The average observed association summarizes the supplied measured values. It is descriptive, not a prediction score, probability, profitability score, recommendation, or indicator-quality rating.
Technical association details
IC is a descriptive association measure between the indicator output and subsequent returns. It is not a prediction score, probability, profitability measure, recommendation, or indicator-quality rating.
Exact supplied values: minimum -0.061276; maximum -0.020483; mean -0.037893409090909.
WHAT WAS NOT MEASURED OR VALIDATED
Evidence boundaries
Research-scope chart comparisonNot included in this 32-scope research sweep
This Research Profile did not repeat a direct reference-chart comparison for every measured scope. The authoritative chart-match result above remains separate; not included here does not mean chart reproduction failed.
Overall market robustnessResearch profile without complete stability across 32 measured scopes
This is the supplied cross-scope research classification when available. Output-level parameter robustness remains a separate evidence type shown above.
TimingNot summarized across scopes
No aggregate timing conclusion is available for the full scope set.
REGIME SUPPORT
How often a market-condition threshold was supported
Across measured scopes
28 of 32 measured scopes had no supported regime.
4 of 32 measured scopes had at least one supported regime.
These supported-regime counts are evidence-threshold outcomes, not trading rules.
A supported regime means the existing evidence threshold was passed for that market condition. It does not establish a trading rule, recommendation, or universal behavior.
TRACEABILITY EXAMPLE
Lead example only · USD_JPY M5
Not universal
0 of 6 conditions passed the existing threshold6 negative directional observations0 positive directional observations0 validated regime claims
These are descriptive directional observations for one example scope. They do not summarize all measured scopes.
What this research does — and does not — establish
This is secondary research evidence. It adds context to the indicator page without replacing the authoritative verdict or changing publication status.
Not NeuronAlgo Verified; this evidence does not grant publication permission.
Not proof of profitability, alpha, prediction, or recommendation.
This research sweep did not repeat direct chart comparison across its measured scope set; the authoritative chart-match result above remains separate.
View full limitations
direct TradingView chart comparison was not performed for the current USD_JPY M5 market scope
Canonical measured coverage: 32/32. Across 32 completed certificate-backed market scopes, the report can compare measured timing, information, regime-cell, and stability behavior without changing any public gate. Lead/example research scope: USD_JPY M5 (ranking convenience only; not a universal indicator scope). On USD_JPY M5, the existing certified-implementation measurement reports a useful descriptive information band with IC -0.0613. Complete fixed-universe stability is unavailable, so this scope is not classified as stable. Measured lag is 0.00 bars; this is timing description, not a trading-quality score. No regime-specific relationship passed the existing promotion threshold; cell directions remain descriptive only. Output-level stability evidence is unavailable; no output-level robustness claim is made.
Implementation-certificate measurements remain research-only and cannot be promoted to the authoritative public verdict.
Do not describe an implementation-conformance certificate as proof of predictive power, profitability, alpha, or a trading recommendation.
Do not describe this certified-only market row as directly chart-conformed, NeuronAlgo Verified, or publishable.
not a profitability claim
not a causal claim
not prediction certainty
not an endorsement
not financial advice
regime cells are descriptive whole-sample conditioning, not automatically tradable filters
empirical association direction is not a buy/sell direction
Do not describe an empirical association as guaranteed profitability or prediction certainty.
Do not infer a buy/sell direction from the sign of an empirical association.
Do not treat descriptive regime cells as automatically tradable historical filters.
Do not describe this run as NeuronAlgo Verified.
Do not describe this research rank as verification, profitability, alpha, an edge, prediction certainty, or a recommendation.
Do not convert unsupported regime-cell directions into validated regime claims.
Do not use output-level stability to promote or weaken the authoritative overall stability classification.
Do not infer indicator semantics from the display name alone.
Do not describe research ranking as verified evidence or publication permission.
Do not treat the lead/example research scope as the overall indicator scope.
Do not use one stable output to promote an unstable overall research profile or research rank.
Do not treat this Research Profile as a new verdict or publication permission.
Do not interpret descriptive association as profitability, alpha, an edge, or a recommendation.
access --platformsready
$ na get williams-r
where this indicator runs, and how you get it
TradingViewPublished Pine script
Runs on TradingView, so there is nothing to install. Open the published script and add it to any chart in your account — you always load the version currently published by its author.
A verdict separates reproducibility from market evidence, then asks whether that evidence remains reliable under broader checks.
01
Chart match
Can we reproduce the indicator’s published calculation?
02
Evidence
Does it show a measurable historical market relationship?
03
Robustness
Does that relationship survive different conditions, market series, and nearby settings?
04
Final decision
Verified only when the required checks finish without a blocking result.
Chart match confirms we evaluated the same indicator. It does not prove profitability. Verification depends on whether the measured relationship is reliable and robust.
Verdicts summarize historical measurements. They are not forecasts, endorsements, promises of profitability, or trading advice.
Declared specification
Declared characteristics and source metadata come from the indicator record, not from the engine verdict.
Rendering
Oscillator
Origin
Third-party
Check glossary
These checks describe different parts of the evidence process; none is a standalone claim of future performance.
Chart match
Checks whether the published chart can be reproduced closely enough for later tests to describe the same indicator; passing it does not establish profitability or verification.
Market relationship
Tests whether indicator values or changes show a statistically supported historical relationship with later returns; it is not a trading strategy or forecast.
Market conditions
Repeats relationship testing across different market conditions to show whether evidence is broad, narrow, or absent; it does not predict the next condition.
Market robustness
Applies the same settings across other market series to test whether the relationship’s direction survives; coverage describes what was tested, not how many series succeeded.
Parameter robustness
Changes nearby numeric inputs to test whether the relationship survives reasonable settings changes rather than depending on one exact configuration.
Repainting
Checks whether values on already-closed bars change after later bars arrive; historical repainting undermines the reliability of historical evidence.
Signal lag
Measures timing delay between indicator changes and price changes; lag describes timing, not predictive power.
library --indicatorsready
Explore the indicator desk
Every indicator is documented under the same spec contract. Browse the full library to compare tools across markets and timeframes.
Charts shown on this page are by TradingView. TradingView® is a registered trademark of TradingView, Inc. TradingView® has no affiliation with NeuronAlgo.
Questions? We typically respond within a few hours.
