NeuronAlgo
DESK PORTFOLIO — NA-PF-AGG-100K

Every number here is provable.

Algorithmic trading systems published with their full statistical spec — equity curves, drawdowns and stress tests you can inspect line by line. No screenshots, no promises.

  • OpenTimestamps records
  • MT5 exports
  • MyFXBook-verified live account
  • Full public spec
161 strategies in catalog
82.0k+ executed trades · backtest
19 portfolio cells engineered
23+ years of test data
01 · Verification first

Audit us before you trust us.

  • Trading records hashed and timestamped on Bitcoin via OpenTimestamps — tampering is mathematically detectable.
  • Raw MT5 exports published, trade by trade.
  • Live account tracked on MyFXBook — third-party, read-only verification.
  • Backtest and live figures are never mixed — every number is labeled.
TOOL 01due_diligence --scanLIVE
Before you trust anyone

Due-Diligence Scan

Paste any vendor's track record and get an automated red-flag report — too-smooth equity, martingale signatures, backtest-vs-live drift. The same checks we run on ourselves.

02 · The numbers, not the hype

Drawdown discipline is the whole game.

Prop challenges are lost to risk, not to entries. We publish the loss math at both levels: each robot alone — then the portfolio cell that blends them.

STEP 1 · THE ROBOT

Every robot earns its place alone

Full public spec per strategy — Sharpe, worst drawdown, trade count. Inspect any of them line by line.

BACKTESTtop_strategies --by sharpe
#StrategySharpeMax DDTrades
01 NA-GJ-L-001 1.10 -7.1% 500 Spec →
02 Cetus 0.88 -20.9% 978 Spec →
03 Bootes 0.86 -11.5% 569 Spec →
STEP 2 · THE PORTFOLIO

Alone they bleed. Together they cover.

A strong robot still has losing stretches. Blended into a portfolio cell, those stretches overlap less and cover each other — the account's worst moment gets shallower than its parts.

NA-GJ-L-001 -7.1%
Cetus -20.9%
Bootes -11.5%
NA-PF-AGG-100K · 56 robots blended -6.0%

max drawdown — standalone catalog robots vs the blended flagship cell · backtest

Open the flagship portfolio spec →

Risk engine, not guesswork

Position sizing, daily loss caps and objective targets are computed per portfolio cell — prop-firm style, published in the open spec.

Own the machine — explore the desk offer →
TOOL 02prop_pass --monte-carloLIVE
Before you pay the fee

Prop-Pass Probability Simulator

Your account size, your firm's rules, our systems — thousands of simulated challenge runs collapse into the one number that matters: your probability of passing.

03 · Methodology

Four gates. No exceptions.

A strategy only ships if it survives all four robustness gates — most candidates die here, by design.

G1

Walk-forward

Out-of-sample efficiency must stay above 0.6 across rolling re-optimization windows.

G2

PBO / CSCV

Probability of backtest overfitting below 0.3 under combinatorially symmetric cross-validation.

G3

Deflated Sharpe

Sharpe significance above 0.95 after correcting for multiple testing and non-normal returns.

G4

Monte-Carlo permutation

Edge must beat randomized entries with p < 0.05 — otherwise it's luck, not logic.

TOOL 03overfit_autopsy --four-gatesLIVE
Most candidates die here

Overfit Autopsy

Upload your strategy report and it faces the exact four gates above — walk-forward, PBO, deflated Sharpe, Monte-Carlo permutation — with a full post-mortem of where and why it breaks.

From hypothesis to your account

  1. 1

    Research

    Hypotheses are generated and tested against decades of tick data.

  2. 2

    Gauntlet

    Every candidate faces the four statistical gates. Survivors are rare.

  3. 3

    Publication

    Full spec goes public — equity curve, drawdowns, trade list, assumptions.

  4. 4

    Monitoring

    Live execution is tracked and published against the published expectations.

Verified everything? Then you're our kind of client.

Start with the evidence — and when the numbers convince you, take the machine home.

Own the machine → See the proof
Scroll to Top